After MySQL Exit – What Next?
January 28th, 2008The biggest open source news so far this year has been that MySQL was bought by Sun Microsystems for a Billion dollars (disclaimer: I was a seed investor in to MySQL). For good analysis check e.g. Stephen O’Grady’s post as well as Stephen Walli’s thougths and for the inside scoop in Jonathan’s post and Zack Urlocker’s post about the process.
Some reactions have surprised me a quite a bit. I have received questions and comments such as that ‘’we lost yet another European high-tech company to the US’’, ‘’does this destroy the promise of open source as MySQL becomes part of this big public company?’’
I would accept the first comment if the company had been sold under priced, but we did not lose MySQL, we SOLD it for 1 BILLION dollars!
This was great news for the Nordic start-up community and especially open source start-up community: a role model and a strong message to the investment community that we can both build great companies in the open source space and we know how to deliver value to the investors.
Now it is time to take the lessons learnt from that case as well as use it as a reference to build the next cases, and I believe we are well on our way.
Just consider the following: right before the news about MySQL/SUN deal, Fortune listed the most expected IPO candidates for 2008, 3 out of 7 were open source companies. Deloitte Touche listed the 10 fastest growing companies out of Finland, that included 2 open source companies, with the top spot going to open source company Nomovok. Helsingin Sanomat had experts vote the most promising growth companies out of Finland, 3 out of 10 were open source companies. In other words there is much more to come and now it is a great time to do it.
I certainly believe there is a bright future for open source and open source driven businesses and I am currently working on with several of them internationally, some that I have already covered in this blog like Ebox out of Spain , or Continuent , which is currently particularly interesting as it is a MySQL partner and we need to see how the SUN deal impacts ISVs like Continuent in the evolving database ecosystem as it is a MySQL partner (and also supports PostgreSQL, in which SUN had invested already earlier).
Something that today’s young entrepreneurs should note about MySQL, it took 12 years to build the business, there are always some exceptions like YouTube where the cashing out happens very quickly, but I would suggest that the timeframe MySQL had is more realistic as a model.
Kevin Harvey said that Benchmark was considered insane to make the investment already back in 2003, what that does make my investment company’s Holtron Ventures team for making the initial investment in 2001? Were/are we stark raving mad? I don’t believe so; I just believe there should be more venture attitude in venture capital than there currently is in Nordics and Europe to build the next MySQL type success stories.
I want to end this post with a quote from Mårten Mickos, CEO of MySQL, which well explains type of things an early investor needs to do and what kind of value they can bring by being insane or mad enough:
“Holtron played a pivotal role in the commercial growth of MySQL by being the first VC in early 2001 to present a term sheet. This contributed to bringing other investors on board, and it also helped me make the decision to join MySQL and not take the other CEO position I was being offered at the time.”